Ditto!
Neelam attended the Loreal brunch held at Olive in a printed Diane von Furstenberg dress, a variation of which was worn by Bhavna at the HDIL Couture week. Neelam paired her dress with her Bottega Veneta clutch and slingbacks also seen on her before here.
Between the two, whose version do you prefer? Our vote goes to Bhavna.
P.S. Both dresses are now available on YOOX if you want to snag them.
![]() |
Left: Neelam at Loreal Paris Brunch at Olive
Right: Diane von Furstenberg (Buy)
![]() |
Left: Bhavna Pandey at HDIL Couture Week
Right:Diane von Furstenberg (Buy)
Photo Credit: Viral Bhayani
I love this on Neelam! I didn’t like it on Bhavna, because it looks like a long kurta and she forgot to wear the salwar lol. Neelam is wearing it better, what with the medium sleeves and its not buttoned up at the hemline. and those nude shoes go perfectly with it too.
agree with K! neelam’s looks more like a dress, especially because it tapers at the bottom. her clutch is looking great with it too.
I like the dress that Bhavna wore but I like Neelam looking lovely overall…
I really prefer Bhavna’s. She looks way more put together and chic. Also, Neelam’s dress is not very flattering :l
Like it on both but prefer Bhavna’s shoes.
I prefer Neelam’s dress more …may be the shoes could have been different …
I like her clutch though and she is looking great ..
Bhavnas really does look like a kurta.. Neelam’s is definitely more of a dress
I think they both look great, but my vote goes for neelam..i like her version better. This print on a button up dress just looks weird. I like how they both accessorized
I like Neelam’s version. The other one is very “dressing-gownish”..!
i like bhavnas, neelam’s is not very flattering
I actually like Bhavna’s version but Neelam’s is not too bad with either:)
we can’t mention the big bad “B” word anymore so of course I won’t – but at a stretch I will opt for Bhavna – cos she looks the most natural in it. Although DvF has some fabulous dresses and generally love her stuff – but this one does very little for either lady.