In Mugler
It was a vintage Mugler (as per her tweet) that Rhea wore to Masaba’s show at the Lakme Fashion Week. She paired the dress with a Celine bag and two-tone pumps.
The dress needed some fierce brought to it and perhaps on someone else it would’ve worked, on Rhea though, it didn’t. At all. The closed neckline and the deconstructed/slouchy shoulder was rather overwhelming on her.
On an aside, ‘vintage’ is ‘on trend’ again, as it usually is with Fashion every now and then. Those shoulders have made a comeback!
Rhea Kapoor At Lakme Fashion Week
Far Left, Left: Dries Van Noten Spring 2011
Right: Miu Miu Fall 2011
Far Right: Jil Sander Fall 2011
Photo Credit: Viral Bhayani, Style
a bathrobe??? LMAO!!! well vintage or not… it looks nothing more than a bathrobe…
LOL
No. No. NO. This just does not work. It looks like she’s wearing a giant trench coat and has nothing on inside. The shoes and bag only make it worse.
Plus the no make up do makes her look like she’s come straight out of the spa!
well…maybe she doesn’t have anything on inside :P hehehe
Why does it look as though she is wearing a bathrobe. I havent ever liked this type of dressing ever! its sooo bathrobe-ish ewwwww.
A friend once brought me back a kimono (stolen from her hotel room!) from Japan, and Rhea’s outfit reminds me of it. I wore my kimono as a bathrobe for years….
I have said it elsewhere and I’ll say it again, this girl does not have the face or style to be doing unconventional things (only the money). Chotis and salwars would look good on her :)
totally agree!!
Strike 3! She is a fashion victim!
she’s looking very matronly in this get up.
God awful! Both, the trend and the piece on Rhea. Looks like she is getting ready for a shower in the first pic.
I’m beginning to think this girl buys all unsuccessful designer wear on sale or something and tries to show off in India. These sisters are slavessss to brand names, particularly this one who doesn’t even have enough sense to put together a decent outfit. Creased, unironed, ill-fitted dress along with accessories better kept hidden at the back of a closet. Fashionista? More like a poor attempt at showing off the money and trying hard to look stylish.
If this doesn’t qualify as WTHeyy, I don’t know what will.
AHHAHAHAHAH, LOVE LOVE LOVE HER COMMENT! SLAVESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
great reply!!!
Totally agree!!!
I would call this look ‘Sophisticated Flasher’ :-)
I guarantee she’s wearin a jacket inside!
she is looking like a flasher!! lol
so matronly!
BAD..Like REALLY BAD!! and why is her hand holding the bag like she’s askin for alms?
ROFL!! Forget the horrendous outfit, whats with the ‘expression’ in the first pic? :))))
You guys never mentioned yaar that I reminded you on Rhea at Masaba. Am such an old follower of this site :(
There was no question of reminding. We just wanted to post it later on.
Oh come on now. Why is this terrible look not in the WTHeyyy!!! category? If this is not WTHeyyy!!! then what is?
It should not matter if the outfit has a designer name and/or is vintage. I’m really disillusioned with the fashion commentary on this site. I hate to join the chorus but it seems some people are spared from criticism no matter how foolish that person looks.
cannot believe rhea had to resort to this to elicit disapproval from p&p. this look is beyond wtheyy and deserves a whole lower category!
Its called “You scratch my back and I scratch yours..”
oh puhleezzee Rhea…puhleezzee….stop it nw…its enough already…getting spotted in normal lookin’ clothes once in a while won’t hurt ur ‘superbly’?? nice fashion status…nw stop being a snob n wear somethin’ proper…
This color just does not complement dark skin tones. Ever heard about concealor?
To me it looks like these kapoor sisters have a check list of whats on trend now in Hollywood and use it in their daily lives. Natalie Portman is wearing a vintage dress? Okay, let me go and find one. After that there is no consideration for how the dress will look or even any thought given to originality.
It’s sooo vintage it has creases as proof ;)
why do i see a dressing gown??
i don’t get the whole vintage charm here??? i can take out the most horrendous outfit out of my mom’s closet and tweet it vintage….
this look was the worst from her so far….i grade it even lower that the “homeless lady look” she sported a while back
:)
This is what we can call a classic example of ‘slave of fashion’, wearing things that are in vogue or back in vogue, and having no clue that you look utterly weired and funny in it.
BTW, she looks like a granny on her daily run to buy Werthers original hard candy from her local pharmacy ;-)
I do not give kudos or props for trying out wacky and completely ridiculous outfits in the name of ” changing it up” .
She’s too petite to carry this off.
I hate it when fashion makes people look plain weird.
Very dowdy. Can’t believe a Manhattan girl would dress like that to a fashion show.
sloppy. But the shoes and handbag I like. I wish she would put a little bit of color on her face, it’s bland.
Everything about this look is just BAD.
MUGLER NEEDS SOME STEAM-IRON!
Okay, Rhea. If you’re going to bother putting thought into your outfits and loving fashion (as you obviously do), why not put some thought into your makeup? You’re getting photographed, meaning people are looking at your photos. Do the viewers a favor and make it a complete package… otherwise… it’s a turn-off. We understand you’re not an actress, we won’t think you’re trying too hard, just that you’re meeting expectations. :)
vintage mintage..whatever.. A hefty price tag doesn’t mean it’ll look good. She just doesn’t have the energy or vibe to pull this off..looks like she’s trying too hard
HORRIBLE!!! concealer can do wonders.
It is dowdy indeed but not a WTH. The dress is nice…it just doesn’t fit her well…
just because its designer, it does not mean its good!!!
Looks like she has wrapped a thick blanket! Ewww…cant handle those shoulders coming back either!
if trash bags have designer tag on it these Kapoor sisters will wear them too.
Fugly!!
This is hilarious. The bag was the cherry on the top.